The Truth about Homelessness

74

By Jane Taxpayer

A variety of factors can contribute to homelessness in Canada.
A variety of factors can contribute to homelessness in Canada.

Poverty and homelessness are the two fastest growing epidemics Canadians face in the 21st century. It is also the most ignored. Citizens all over the country have taken a NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard) approach to these issues for the past ten years. As long as they can’t see it, it’s not there. I bet their attitude would change if they learned taxpayers were on the hook for roughly $4.5 billion annually in caring for the homeless. These costs include shelter operations, health care and hospital visits, justice (policing, holding cells, court appearances, etc., heck, lets add the cost of the paper that’s used to write tickets), and treatment programs for addictions and mental illness, and many more. As a comparison, the reduction of the GST in 2006 from 7% - 6% saved taxpayers a mere $4.35 billion.

Despite my residence in Calgary, the home of Canada’s best economy – even in the recession – and home to Canada’s third highest sheltered homeless population, I am going to try to keep things in a national approach. After all, 2006 estimates state that there are roughly 150,000 homeless in Canada. If we add couch surfers, and other temporary homeless, that could rise up to 200,000 – 300,000 at any given point of time. 1 in 10 Canadians live below the poverty line. 1 in 7 Canadians pay 30% or more of their household income on shelter. That includes those who own their own home. Renters are the most hard pressed, in many cases paying around 40% of their household income. Canada’s 2001 Census stated that over 700,000 Canadians were paying 50% or more of their household income on shelter.

Some of the stereotypes about the homeless are true, but we can no longer blame the nationwide pandemic on addictions, or mental health, or medication, or crime. In a 2006 Environs Survey, 49% of Canadians said they believed they would be poverty stricken if they missed one or two paycheques. 66% of homeless listed either a lack of income or the rising cost of housing as the reason they live on the street.

However, the lack of income is not due to laziness, or refusal to work. A 2009 Salvation Army report states that more than one – quarter of Canadian homeless work. This number is the highest in the Prairies (48%) and lowest in the Atlantic Provinces (8%). Here in Calgary, The Mustard Seed Shelter estimates about 60% of its guests work some of the time. At the Calgary Drop In and Rehabilitation Centre, they say about 40% work 32 hours or more a week, 17% work part-time, and 33% also do some temp work. That being said, it’s likely that some of the 33% also belong to one of the two former categories. Obviously, it’s not for a lack of trying.

There is a dark side to homelessness, however. The Salvation Army reports that 41% of Canadian homeless suffer from addictions. British Columbia reported the highest, and Quebec the lowest, with 51% and 15% respectively, admitting to addictions. For starters, these individuals probably will not be fit for work anytime soon, and need treatment. The problem? The waiting list for many detox centres and recovery houses are sometimes months long – and that’s if you’re being fast-tracked. It is also important to note that many of these people were not exposed to the drug they eventually became addicted to until they were on the streets. From there, because of easy access and target black market marketing strategies, an addiction becomes a disease that spreads and infects among the homeless. Alcoholism, crack/cocaine, crystal meth, and heroine are just some of the more common addictions you will see among the homeless community, and with the exception of alcohol, the majority of these addictions usually are contracted after an individual becomes homeless.

Many homeless also suffer from mental illness. The Canadian average for mental illness among the homeless is 33%, a number which does not differ much in most regions across the country. I cannot say whether mental illness leads to homelessness, but I am certain that a lack of treatment can. And often times, it is very difficult to access proper treatment. Waiting lists for treatment can be anywhere from two weeks to six months, and even when one does eventually get in, the doctors and therapists are so understaffed that they likely won’t be seeing them as often as they should in order to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Most, if not all, shelters do not have any staff equipped really to deal with disorders such as general anxiety disorder, schizophrenia (which is surprisingly rare, even among the homeless, at only 5.7%), and other mental health issues. Because a homeless individual is less likely to get the support they need, they are less likely to keep a job, or find permanent housing.

Now that the truth about homelessness has been exposed, here are my recommendations for trying to fix these problems. This is a break from my previous essays in which I expose the problem, but offer little in the ways of solutions.

· I recommend the federal, provincial, and municipal Governments dedicate at least 5% each of their total budgets to re-integrating the homeless into the mainstream of society. This includes addictions treatment, adequate health services, mental health initiatives targeting the homeless and those who are at risk of becoming homeless, and events to help build a fractured relationship between the homeless and the mainstream citizens of the municipality.

· Ten year plans have been shown to drastically reduce the number of homelessness in cities such as Detroit, Seattle and San Francisco. I would encourage municipalities and provinces that have not done so to consider this option thoroughly. If your city or province already has one, they should perform an honest and transparent evaluation on its progress on a regular basis. Teeray has an excellent hub on ten year plans, and I will include it in the links section.

· Instead of cities just buying-up land to build low income housing, they should consider purchasing already existing buildings for the purpose of low-income housing or apartments. They should be spread out among a variety of communities, including the suburbs, so as to avoid establishing a ghetto.

· Living wages should be policy at most businesses. Each province, in addition to the established minimum wage, should also have a guideline for what constitutes a living wage, so as businesses that do have a living wage policy have something to go on.

· 35% of the homeless population in Canada is aboriginal, even in urban areas. The federal and provincial governments should commit to trades training for aboriginal youth. I recommend an age of 15 years or older as a target group.

· In 1989, the federal government committed to reducing child poverty by the year 2000. It is now 2009 and the number of families living in shelters has almost doubled, and children living in shelters (including youth shelters) has almost tripled. We need to recommit to solving child poverty. After all, a child living in poverty, even housed poverty, will be more likely to end up homeless. A good start is to increase the child tax benefit.

· Finally, there must be more measures in place designed to prevent poverty and homelessness. Right now a family on welfare, even if one member can earn income, is still well below the poverty line. I’m working on the theory that enough welfare to keep a family above the poverty line will mean more money monthly, but most likely for a shorter period of time. I’m not saying they need to be thousands of dollars above the Low Income Cut Off (LICO), but I do believe that if they are kept floating just above the poverty line, it allow them to live relatively comfortably with a peace of mind, and still allow them to save and eventually come off income supports sooner.

If these policies are implemented, we may see a change sooner than we think.

 

Comments

Jason R. Manning profile image

Jason R. Manning Level 4 Commenter 19 months ago

Jane,

I really wish you could get every bit of your plan established. We need a full on 10 year committal to see if there is a cure.

Question; your country and my country have thrown more money at this problem from the past 30 years to date and the issue is getting worse. No one ever knows what to do about drugs, as they are an undermining topic. Realistically, if we can not get rid of drugs, and we have spent more money previously, is there not some undocumented paralysis hiding in the shadows?

by the way, I voted you up and useful...

Jane Taxpayer Hub Author 19 months ago

I think the "undocumented paralysis" is ideology. And by that I mean that ideology is the biggest barrier to addressing homelessness. In fact ideology is what drives persons to tackle the drug issue - instead of - the homeless issue.

People see the drug addicted homeless mainly because the majority of homelessness don't panhandle and are, in fact, very hidden. they do have a sense of shame, and in fact may actually work odd jobs here and there during the day, and are therefore less visible during working hours.

I would say we don't cure the flu by treating a fever or upset stomach. We shouldn'y target symptoms of homelessness, but target homelessness itself.

You are quite correct when you say we've been throwing money at the problem for 30 years (or more) but the trouble is, we've been throwing money at the symptoms of the problem, and not the problem itself.

Jason R. Manning profile image

Jason R. Manning Level 4 Commenter 19 months ago

The last thing I want to see created is more governmental bureaucracies that soak up tax funding before they get serious with administering to the purpose. With your research uncovering such a high level (I think anyway) of dementia, should we not build wings to established convalescent homes, where they are trained in mental disorder?

I am not passing judgment on those who lost jobs and turned to homelessness as their only means. I do toe a line or equate some level of mental block, deficiency or whatever name you are comfortable calling it with regards to giving up the fight. I have lost jobs, lost homes, cars, BK and never have I given up. I honestly do not know, nor understand the human condition that does finally give up and give in.

Likening this to released inmates, an idea I proposed to someone else is use an existing job placement agency to link candidates in fields of knowledge. Do not let inmates out without a job to start in 24 hrs, same for homeless in a program. Sooner or later, something still has to be done about drugs…I have no answers that sensible people would appreciate.

Jane Taxpayer Hub Author 19 months ago

Again, employment is still an ideological issue. Where I live, there exists a larger number of homeless who are employed than any other region in Canada. As a matter fact, many of our homeless were persons who travelled from poorer regions of the country to find stable employment, and could not find stable or affordable housing. To force employment on homeless persons (And I am referring only to those whose physical and mental health would allow for them to be gainfully employed) is only a band-aid solution. We have to find out why someone who is employed and has no addictions cannot find affordable housing.

While the addictions issue is something that needs to be addressed, I find it unfair to say we have to address it in terms of homelessness. In fact, at least in my part of the world, addictions is rampant among the middle and upper classes more so than in the homeless community. Drugs is not a homeless problem. It is a society problem. The only difference is that the middle and upper classes can afford there habits - for now.

Jason R. Manning profile image

Jason R. Manning Level 4 Commenter 19 months ago

Jane,

I am not trying to put words in your mouth. I understood what you were saying in your article about the rampant use of “part” time employment, and lacking “stable” employment. Just a hunch, but high taxes are a part of the problem not the solution. Many would like to see higher taxation to subsidize really low income housing. How does higher taxation not put more citizens out of business?

Higher taxation creates increased cheating and subverting of the system. Sure some will always pay those taxes, and others will continue to choose to do with less until one day all they have is a tiny flat in some crappy neighborhood where no one wants to raise a family.

It’s the giving with out earning I have a problem with. I am not talking about charitable giving, I am talking about distribution to those with the means to study, work longer hours and increase their self worth. Society chooses its hero’s and pays them accordingly to their adulation…look at idiotic, brainless athletes straight out of high school making millions because they can hit a ball, or make a touch down. The fans put them their, people do not have money at the end of the month because of the choices they made the other 29-30 days. People who have little money have to make better choices, is this wrong to expect that? You do not go out and blow your money at the local pub if you can barely pay your rent.

Let me ask you, do you think that there is not adequate opportunity for individuals to take control of their own life and invest more effort in themselves?

What drives you Jane to go out and fight vs. others who won’t?

Jane Taxpayer Hub Author 19 months ago

The one thing that drives me to fight is that I used to be homeless and saw and experienced these things first hand. And many other homeless, formerly homeless, indigent, and allies do so as well. But we have a recurring problem of having our words falling on deaf ears. I believe this is - though I admit the problem goes deeper than this - because its easier to believe what we've always believed about homelessness, than it is to admit something is wrong with our society and we can do something about it.

I simply want my children to inherit a better world than the one I inherited. The world is a fortune, passed onto our generation. I view our job - as any person inheriting a family fortune - is to take this fortune and invest in it and increase it's worth, so the next generation has an even larger one.

I would also like to say that many homeless persons don't feel there lives are worth investing in, for a variety of reasons. When someone is treated like they have no worth, it is more difficult for that individual to ever feel he has any worth. Employers don't want to hire homeless persons, landlords don't want to rent to homeless persons, and residents don't want affordable housing in their neighbourhood. No wonder homeless persons who don't fight don't think it's worth fighting. Because it's personal, and they don't think they - as individuals are worth fighting for.

I also agree - partially - on your statement about taxes. I do some positive benifits to lowering property taxes for both residential and commercial, as in theory that would make the idea of better wages and lower rent more feasible. However I also believe that a deeper problem is a mismanagement in how tax dollars are alotted.

I wouldn't exactly want to see my taxes increased, but I am willing to pay my taxes towards certain social programs because as someone who has payed into those programs, it's good to know that they are there if I ever need them again. But even within social programs they still need to be accountable to the taxpayer, which is something I think you might agree with me on - we're not seeing.

Jason R. Manning profile image

Jason R. Manning Level 4 Commenter 19 months ago

Good Day Jane,

I find zero issue with your reply. I do not mind paying specific taxes, I do mind the incessant hiring of more government officials who do nothing but stand inline to be the first to empty the cookie jar. This does not help our needy.

I understand you reflection of the human condition, one of troubling thoughts stifled by limited self value. I wish there were a real solution that had nothing to do with political and religious strings attached. I am not dismissive of the plight of homeless, but, there is unequivocal proof that no government or rule has ever solved this problem among the centuries previous.

This is one of the many reasons I believe in God’s justice, only Christ will cover all the down trodden when our time is up. Only Christ will make good on the broken promises of an enlightened society. By all means, it doesn’t negate our constant effort for correction, but I merely state the above knowing only the Lord can truly give lasting value back to the lost.

I have no answers for the agnostic or Atheist, for those beliefs really make Earth a hard and judicially empty place.

Take care.

Jane Taxpayer Hub Author 19 months ago

Every time a layer of beauracracy is added, it only "cuts the red tape horizontally." We need to ensure that persons who are capable of making a decision are moved closer to the front line, and thus reducing beauracratic layers and the amount of hoops someone in help has to jump through.

progressivist profile image

progressivist Level 2 Commenter 6 months ago

Amazing hub and thank you for bringing to light a very important issue!

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working